2008年8月27日星期三

删除MSN SPACE上的垃圾评论

MSN SPACE上偶尔有些的垃圾评论,少的话我也不管了,但最近夸张了一点,一下就来了3、4个,一定要想办法。
如果浏览和评论的权限区分开来就会好一点,有些知识分享的内容要可以浏览,但评论就不必了。好像MSN SPACE还没有这个功能。
要找个简单点的方法手动删除。

参考 http://www.msnfly.cn/thread-2819-1-1.html

法1:
通过进入你Live Spaces的Mobile页面:http://空间ID.mobile.spaces.live.com/
可以看到最近的评论,然后一条条删除,但好像对旧的评论就没什么办法。

法2:
通过日志摘要,在主页点日志,在进入日志后点摘要。
也可以通过下面的方法进入:http://空间ID.spaces.live.com/?_c11_BlogPart_BlogPart=summary&_c=BlogPart
看到有评论的地方,点击评论将评论展开,就可以在每条评论上打勾,最后点删除选中的项目。

卤素灯就是卤钨灯

http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/2084040.html?fr=qrl&fr2=query

卤素灯
充有溴碘等卤族元素或卤化物的钨灯称为卤素灯或卤钨灯。它是新一代白炽灯。
为提高白炽灯的发光效率,必须提高钨丝的温度,但相应会造成钨的蒸发,使玻壳发黑。在白炽灯中充入卤族元素或卤化物,利用卤钨循环的原理可以消除白炽灯的 玻壳发黑现象。这就是卤素灯的来由。但为确保卤钨循环的正常进行,必须大大缩小玻壳尺寸,以提高玻壳温度(一般要求碘钨灯的玻壳温度为250-600℃, 溴钨灯的玻壳温度为200-1100℃),使灯内卤化钨处于气态。因此,卤素灯的玻壳必须使用耐高温和机械强度高的石英玻璃。其结构有双端直管形、单端圆 柱形和反射形。由于使用石英玻璃作玻壳,卤素灯又常称石英灯。其中反射形卤素灯因带有反射杯,又常称杯灯。卤钨灯功率有5W、10W、15W、20W、 25W、30W、35W、40W、45W、50W、60W、70W、100W、150W、200W和250W等多种。工作电压有6V、12V、24V、 28V、110V和220V等多种。灯头有螺口式(E10、E11、E14等)、插入式(GU5.3、GX5.3、GY6.35、GZ4和G8等)和直接 引出式。其中杯灯还有带前罩与不带前罩之分。杯口直径有25mm(MR8),35mm(MR11)和50 mm(MR16)等几种。反射角有8°、10°、12°、20°、24°、30°、36°、40°和60°等多种。
由于卤素灯中钨的蒸发受到有效的抑制,加之卤钨循环消除了玻壳发黑,卤素灯灯丝的温度就可大大提高(高达3000℃),使卤素灯的发光效率远比普通白炽灯 高。例如,白炽灯需要消耗75W电能才能达到960流明的光通量,而卤素灯仅需50W。卤素灯尤其吸引人的地方是它的体积小巧玲珑,品种规格多种多样,尤 其杯灯可把光线集中反射,相对于散射型光源而言,消耗同样电功率,可获得强得多的照度,因此,人们觉得卤素灯"特别明亮",能使物体的表面色泽更绚丽,光 彩更夺目,甚至觉得有迷人的闪烁效果。杯灯的反射角度有从窄到宽多种角度可供选择(越窄越觉明亮),也给专业灯光设计提供很大的创意空间。
卤素灯具有体积小、发光效率高(达17-33 lm/W)、色温稳定(可选取2500K-3500K)、光衰小(5%以下)、寿命长(可达3000小时至5000小时)等特点,这些特点显示出它有取代 普通白炽灯的趋势。但石英玻璃昂贵,卤素灯的价格当然要比白炽灯高。
同白炽灯一样,卤钨灯按用途、结构和外形也可分成许多类别

最长命的灯泡

http://www.cctv.com/program/qqzxb/20080510/102287.shtml

这只长寿灯泡隶属于美国加州利佛摩尔市消防队,是功率仅为4瓦的碳丝灯泡,用来为那些24小时待命出勤的队员提供照明。日前,吉尼斯世界纪录确认,这只 107岁高龄的"寿星灯泡"是"全球最老的电灯泡"。至于这只寿星灯泡的"长寿秘诀",许多人猜测说,由于它从不开关,所以灯丝寿命超长。现在,这只"寿 星灯泡"还拥有自己的官方网站,全球的"粉丝"们都可通过网络"瞻仰"这只传奇灯泡。

http://everything2.com/e2node/The%2520long-lasting%2520light%2520bulb%2520of%2520Livermore%252C%2520California

In a fire station in Livermore, California, a light bulb has burned since 1901-- almost continuously. Only on a couple of occasions has it been turned off, during moves. When they placed it in a socket at the new location, it lit up. Power failures have also temporarily dimmed the bulb.
No, really.
The bulb bears no marks, but historians believe that the Shelby Electric Company manufactured the 4-watt item. Dennis Bernal, owner of Livermore Power and Light, donated it to the city's joint fire/police station in 1901. It has served as a garage night light, first at at the fire department hose cart house in 1901, then at the new fire station in the 1930s, and again at a station opened in 1976.
In 1972, the Ripley's Believe it or Not! Museum researched the bulb and declared it authentic-- though they have a certain history for credulity. The program On the Road with Charles Kurault profiled the enigmatic bulb around the same time. The Guinness Book of World Records has also listed the bulb, though they state only that evidence supports the town's claim. Numerous newspapers, magazines, radio and tv shows have investigated the bulb. The skeptical Mikkelsons of the Snopes Urban Legend Site vouch for the bulb's authenticity.
The Livermore light likely served as the inspiration for Byron the Immortal Light Bulb from Thomas Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow.
Livermore celebrates its bulb, and threw a centennial for it in 2001. They also established a bulb webcam, at the official website (See http://www.centennialbulb.org/photos.htm). The bulb's incandescence can be viewed from around the world.
Livermore's bulb is not unique. A New York City hardware store had a 1912 light which continued to burn until at least the 1970s. A bulb at the Palace Theater in Fort Worth, Texas lasted 68 years. Another in the washroom of an Ipswich Electrical Shop appears to have lasted from 1930 to 2001, when it finally went the way of all flash.
Some people wonder why modern lights could not burn so long. Others expound theories conspiratorial and claim that such lights could easily be manufactured, but that the vast, all-powerful bulb-manufacturing interests prevent it from happening, lest they lose our repeat business. Steven Johnson of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, among others, says that, in fact, light manufacturers merely respond to consumer demand. They "can make it very dim to last for a very long period of time, or they can make it bright... and last for 750 or a thousand hours" (quoted in Knapp). The Livermore bulb has burned for more than one hundred years, but it has not burned brightly; it could really only be used as a night light.
Provided the fire-fighters of Livermore's Station #6 are not otherwise occupied, the public may visit the bulb Monday through Friday from 8 am to 5 pm.

主页:
http://www.centennialbulb.org/

实时图片:
http://www.centennialbulb.org/cam.htm
说是10更新一次,但到现在还是08年8月21日17点29分39秒的。

难道灯坏了?还是摄像机坏了?

2008年8月24日星期日

鼠标、键盘到底有没有辐射

说法1:
http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/30171633.html

你知道计算机的辐射量是多少吗?
1、键盘1000V/m
2、鼠标450V/m
3、屏幕218V/m
4、主机170V/m
电脑的键盘、鼠标为何会有电磁辐射呢?因为它们是通过主机的交流电能产生交变信号实现所有功能的,所以能产生低频辐射。 (应该是整流后的直流,不存在低频辐射)
简便的说:因为键盘、鼠标都是和电脑的主机相连接的。如果是无线键盘、鼠标。那电磁辐射就几乎没有,非常小。
而距离两英尺以最高发射功率计算,一个802.11b无线鼠标、键盘等设备所产生的辐射仅为每平方厘米2微瓦(1微瓦为百万分之一瓦特)。而性能更高的 802.11g产品所释放的辐射就更小了。美国联邦通信委员会FCC规定,只要无线网络设备的辐射限定在每平方厘米1000微瓦之内都是安全的。因此,哪 怕有几十个无线设备同时在一个房间内使用,也不会对人体产生危害。专家表示:"电磁波产生最多的地方是插电的电线,而键盘的布线符合向周围泄漏电磁辐射的问题。"华北计算技术研究所的崔屹则认为:"键盘因为泄漏的电磁辐射,更成为除显示器外信息最容易被截获并被复现的设备。"


说法2:
http://zhidao.baidu.com/question/30171633.html

在Google上键入"键盘辐射",0.2秒后跳出85100条检索结果。粗粗 浏览,"键盘辐射,敲响健康警钟!"、"电脑辐射伤害最大在键盘"、"站在辐射的问题上选键盘"等帖子比比皆是。点击进入阅读正文,有关"键盘辐射最大" 的描述更是"证据确凿":键盘1000伏特/米(电磁辐射的通用计量单位)、鼠标450伏特/米、屏幕218伏特/米、主机170伏特/米。莫非键盘真的 就是被人忽视的电脑辐射污染源?
市计量测试技术研究院电磁兼容重点实验室业务主管林志煌说,即便都是键盘,不同 厂商的产品所产生的电磁辐射也不同。将键盘、鼠标、屏幕、主机四种不同电脑部件放在一起做比较,本身就不是科学态度。更何况,从理论上讲,耗电量越大的电 子产品产生电磁辐射的几率越高。在键盘、鼠标、屏幕、主机四者之中,显然是主机和屏幕更耗电。
那么,网上盛传的检测数据又是如何得来的呢?林志煌推测,这可能是某些对电磁辐射问题感兴趣的大学生私下检测的结果。他告诉记者,在一些电子商 场,大学生很容易买到测试电磁辐射的简易量表,它的前端是块海绵体,内置一个小型感应器。一旦测量者无法对键盘、鼠标、屏幕、主机的测量距离做到 "一视同仁",得出的结果将与实际情况相去甚远。"要知道,就电磁辐射来说,1000伏特/米是一个非常惊人的数量级,怎会出自小小一块键盘?"林志煌的 解释彻底为键盘"洗"清了"罪名"。
尽管有关电磁波是否会伤害人体脑电波的争论,国际上尚无定论,但林志煌提醒消费者,购买电子产品一定要认准"3C"标志。这一标志表示,该产品所 产生的电磁辐射符合国家标准。对于电脑前放上一盆仙人掌就能减少辐射的"民间妙方",林志煌则不敢苟同:"除非你在面前放一块铁板将电磁波反射回去,否则 只能是自欺欺人。"

说法3:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/07/13/can_your_keyboard_kill_you/

Repetitive Strain Injury (RSI) could be caused by radiation emitted from keyboards. (重复性劳损可能是由键盘释放的电磁幅射引起的,LSZ译)No, we're not making this up.(我们不是开玩笑的,SF译;我们并不是在危言耸听,LSZ译)
A letter published in the December edition of Journalist, the magazine of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ), speculates whether the "electromagnetic radiation immediately under each fingertip" could be to blame for the debilitating and painful condition.
The letter reads: Has anyone explored the possibility of RSI being caused by the radiation emitted by keyboard strokes every time one keys a letter? The make-and-break of electronic keys must issue a short burst of electromagnetic radiation immediately under each fingertip and the body's nervous system comprises a myriad of electrical pathways - might it not have a cumulative adverse effect?


说法4:
http://www.safety.uwa.edu.au/policies/computer_workstation_ergonomics

Keyboard equipment and radiation
Computer screens emit visible light which allows the characters on the screen to be seen. Weak electromagnetic fields and very low levels of other radiation, not visible to the human eye, can be detected by sensitive instruments. Similar emissions are produced by television receivers.
The levels of most radiations and electromagnetic fields emitted from computers are much less than those from natural sources, such as the sun or even the human body and are well below levels considered to be harmful by responsible expert bodies such as the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA).

防键盘辐射的设备:
http://www.lessemf.com/computer.html

Reduce Electric Fields from your Keyboard!
VeilShield is a high performance shielding fabric which is very sheer and easy to see through. Simply drape it over your keyboard, mouse, or any other device and you can still see and operate almost like normal. Stock material is 58 inches wide and very easy to trim to any size with ordinary scissors. Specify length when ordering. Remember, you will need to purchase a ground cord!

2008年8月23日星期六

火星机复活了

昨天和朱一起努力了半天,火星机貌似复活了。

用了一年多,都没什么问题,但这两个月出现使用中突然黑屏,摸上去温度有点高。

HP的笔记本散热的确不是很好,但是突然出现问题,感觉是软件的问题。我觉得最值得怀疑的是金山毒霸,老是在后台自己更新,使机器变慢,而且经常查毒的话,回让CPU占用率高,硬盘转得多,发热也高。没有连上网的时候,经常提示要连接到网络,也不知道是不是中毒了。

后来用HP的自动恢复功能恢复了一下,用回原来的Norton,居然还有3个月的使用期。以后可以用360卫士试试看。

软件也不多装了,Firefox 3、MSN、TM、WPS,本来是想装Lotus Symphony的。

连续用了6个小时,也没发现什么问题。


2008年8月21日星期四

DL型、定时限、电磁式,GL型、反时限、感应式

http://www.dzyd.com/xxzx/gw050603.html

DL型
为了实现过电流保护的选择性,应将线路各段的保护动作时间按阶梯原则来整定,即离电源端越近时限越长。每段时限级差一般为 0.5秒。继电器的动作时间和短路电流的大小无关。采用这种动作时限方式的称为定时限。定时限过流继电器为电磁式,配有时间继电器获得时限特性,其型号为DL型

GL型

反时限是使动作时间与短路电流的大小无关,当动作电流大时,动作时间就短,反之则动作时间长,利用这一特性做成的继电器称为反时限过流继电器。它是感应 式,型号为GL型。它的动作电流和动作时间的关系可分为两部分:一部分为定时限,一部分为反时限。当短路电流超出一定倍数时,电流的增加不再使动作时间缩 短,此时表现为定时限特性。

2008年8月20日星期三

电动机负荷的负载系数、使用系数、同时系数


www.ise.ufl.edu/capehart/papers/diversity.doc
http://www.ise.ufl.edu/capehart/papers/diversity.html
http://www.ise.ufl.edu/capehart/papers/ebaltemp.xls

这些东西是一个叫Barney L. Capehart教授的资料里面找到的,主要是用于计算用电费用。他的Use (or utilization) factor是用于计算用电量的,不是一般所说的利用系数,这里暂时称为使用系数,使用系数x年使用小时基数=年使用小时数。利用系数和这里Load factor 比较接近,这里暂时称为负载系数。Diversity factor 就是同时系数。

Definitions:
  1. Load factor - the ratio of the load that a piece of equipment actually draws when it is in operation to the load it could draw (which we call full load).
     For example, an oversized motor - 20 hp - drives a constant 15 hp load whenever it is on. The motor load factor is then 15/20 = 75%.  

  2. Use (or utilization) factor - the ratio of the time that a piece of equipment is in use to the total time that it could be in use.
     For example, the motor above may only be used for eight hours a day, 50 weeks a year. The hours of operation would then be 2000 hours, and the motor use factor for a base of 8760 hours per year would be 2000/8760 = 22.83%. With a base of 2000 hours per year, the motor use factor would be 100%. The bottom line is that the use factor is applied to get the correct number of hours that the motor is in use.  

  3. Diversity factor - the probability that a particular piece of equipment will come on at the time of the facility's peak load.
     The diversity factor is the most complicated of these factors. For example, we might have ten air conditioning units that are 20 tons each at a facility. In Florida we typically assume that the average full load equivalent operating hours for the units are 2000 hours per year. However, since the units are each thermostatically controlled, we do not know exactly when each unit turns on. If the ten units are substantially bigger than the facility's actual peak A/C load, then fewer than all ten units will likely come on at once. Thus, even though each unit runs a total of 2000 hours a year, they do not all come on at the same time to affect the facility's peak load. The diversity factor gives us a correction factor to use, which results in a lower total kW load for the ten A/C units. If the energy balance we do for this facility comes out within reason, but the demand balance shows far too many kW for the peak load, then we can use the diversity factor to bring the kW into line with the facility's true peak load. The diversity factor does not affect the kWh; it only affects the kW.


Motor load factors in many facilities are more in the range of 40% - 50%, than in the range of 80% that had been a standard assumption for many years of doing audits. Rarely do you find a motor running at 100% load factor.

However, not all motors at a facility are running at the same load factors. Ventilating fans that come from a supplier as a packaged unit with a fan and a motor are most often assumed to be operating at near full load. You should probably use a load factor of 80% here, since the manufacturer of the ventilating fans should have reasonably matched these loads. Other motors may also be in this category - some engineering judgment and common sense are required to determine which other motors these are.  

Motors with variable loads are going to have the lowest load factors in general. A dust collector fan motor will normally have quite a variable load, and would often be expected to have a low load factor. Other examples are saws, presses, milling machines, sanders and grinders, waste grinders, water pumps, hydraulic pumps, etc. 

If a group of motors do not all operate together all of the time, then using a diversity factor is appropriate. This is the case with a number of separate air conditioning units (considering the motors for the compressors) that are individually thermostatically controlled. It could also be the case for a group of production motors if some of the motors are not in use all of the time. You should use a diversity factor in your motor calculations, since it is not often the case that a facility has all of the motors on at the same time.

Reconciling the energy balance: When you perform an energy balance, do not use the motor load factor as the first and only adjustment made to reconcile the estimated energy use (energy balance) with the energy bills. Making this adjustment too quickly results in failure to pick up other things that have been overlooked.

For example, if the energy use does not balance with the energy bills, the first step is to check to see that all of the equipment and uses have been accounted for.

Do the items on the energy balance spreadsheet match your recollection of the equipment you saw in the facility?
Does anything appear to be missing?
Are the utility bills for total energy use and peak kW recorded correctly?

The next step is to check the hours of use for lights and other equipment to see if it matches your knowledge of the facility's operation. Remember that each motor - as well as each other piece of equipment - does not necessarily operate the same number of hours each day or year. Finally, if some of the equipment does not come on at the same time as the facility peaks in kW use, then utilize the diversity factor to account for this.

Adjusting the motor load factors should probably be the last thing you do to reconcile the energy and demand balances. Now, if all other information and all other factors are correct to the best of your knowledge, then adjust the load factors. While motor load factors are not often in the range of 80-100%, you should be equally suspect of very low motor load factors. If you get motor load factors in the range of 20-30%, it is more likely that you have the hours of use wrong than that you have a facility which is using motors that are an average of four times too big for the job they are doing. Lumber mills and wood products facilities using lots of saws may have these low load factors. Most other places should have motors with a higher load factor.

Basic motor load measurements should be taken at the plant visit. The electrical person at the facility is generally willing to measure the current being drawn by a motor of interest. Air compressors are ones that are usually easy to do, and you should ask the plant personnel to do this for you. Let them open the motor controller or switch box and connect a clamp-on ammeter to see what the current for the motor is. You then need to know the full load current from the nameplate of the motor. The ratio of the actual current to the full load current is the approximate load factor on the motor at that time. This procedure works as long as the current is greater than or equal to about 50% of the full load current. Try to take this measurement for each of the large motors in the facility - i.e. motors of 50 hp and above; or even 20 hp or above if the facility does not have a lot of big motors. If you have not received formal electrical safety training, you should not make these electrical measurements yourself. If the facility electrician does not want to make these for you, then let it go at that.

Air handlers―use factor: Air handlers use motors and are subject to all of the comments made in the motor section. In addition, you may be able to get a better handle on the hours of use for the air handlers by knowing how the A/C system works. Ask if the air handlers run constantly when the facility is occupied. They might if the facility wants the ventilation, even though the compressors might not come on except to periodically provide some temperature reduction or moisture removal. If this is the case, then the use factor for these air handler motors should reflect an hours-of -use that matches the offices or other area that the air handlers supply. In addition, the hours-of-use must also consider the compressor run hours. Thus the total hours for the air handlers must be at least the same as the compressor hours, and may be higher if the A/C unit is left on during periods that the facility is not occupied, or if ventilation is provided.

If the air handlers only come on when the thermostat orders cooling, then the hours-of -use must be the same as the hours-of-use of the compressors.

It is important to get adequate information on the operation of the air conditioning system. To get complete data on the air handler motors for an air-conditioned facility, you will need all of the standard information - size, maker, single or three phase, etc - together with the operating basis for the air handlers discussed above.

You should also collect data on the drive belt system for air handlers. Record the number of belts, the lengths, and the types of belts. Ask about motor and drive lubrication and cleaning. Also check the A/C filters to see if they are reasonably clean.

Sometimes a visual inspection will show some real problems. Ask the maintenance person to open up one of the air handlers - or just look into it (SAFELY) if it is accessible - and see if the belt is tight, slack, or really loose. Do not stick your hand into an air handler that is off at the moment, and may come back on when the thermostat kicks in. Have the maintenance person turn the air handler motor off with the circuit breaker or control box. Do not put your finger on a moving drive belt.

Is the belt in good shape?
Is it frayed, cracked or coming apart?
Does it look like the pulleys for the motor and the fan are lined up?

Ask the electrician to measure the current that the air handler motor is drawing to see what its load factor is while driving the fan. It should be very near full load - but you never know. Maybe the original motor burned out and was replaced with a bigger one to "make sure it did not burn out again." Remember to take the full load current off the nameplate to find the load factor.